Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Rommel Querol v. Richards, et al
as 22-16343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMMEL QUEROL
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARDS, C.O., A. SMITH, D. BELL and others
Querol v. Richards et al
as 1:2022cv01800
Plaintiff:
Rommel Querol
Defendant:
C/O Richards, A. Smith, D. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv00033
Defendant:
B. Newman, P. Lawrence, Steve Bullock and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kenneth D. Bell v. Todd Disner et al
as 8:2020mc00004
Receiver:
Matthew E Orso
Defendant:
Kevin Thanh Le, Trudy Gilmond, David Kettner and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Bell and Kenneth D. Bell in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Bell v. Kelly
as 6:2019cv01690
Respondent:
Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision and Brandon Kelly
Petitioner:
Larry D. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edward Jordan v. Dr. Ben Lee et al
as 2:2019cv05182
Defendant:
S. Pina, Dr. C Bingham DDS, D. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael D. Bell v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv01752
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Ford Motor Company, P.F. Automotive, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Bell v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2018cv00127
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Ford Motor Company, P.F. Automotive, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 bc Removal- Breach of Contract
Rogelio Rojas Flores v. Sandra R. Brown et al
as 2:2017cv06373
Defendant:
Baltazar, Baltazar, Alissa D. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Rojas Flores
McKinley Jr. v. Ruddy (NP) et al
as 3:2017cv00154
Plaintiff:
Donnie Ray McKinley Jr.
Defendant:
J. Ruddy (NP), M. Qazi (MD), K. H. Tang (PA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
