Cases 61 - 70 of 113
Manuel Arreola v. Randy Grounds et al
as 3:2016cv03133
Plaintiff:
Manuel Arreola
Defendant:
Randy Grounds , D. Bright , J. Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hadden v. Kernan et al
as 3:2016cv02686
Plaintiff:
Michael Kenneth Hadden
Defendant:
Steve Kernan, W.L. Muniz, R.T.C. Grounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Bradley v. Homer Bryson, et al
as 16-12376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL PAUL BRADLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMER BRYSON, Georgia Department of Corrections, WILLIAM A. PRIOR, JR., Chief Judge, Morgan County, Georgia and FREDRIC D. BRIGHT, District Attorney, Baldwin County
Hadden v. Kernan et al
as 1:2016cv00639
Plaintiff:
Michael Kenneth Hadden
Defendant:
Steve Kernan, W.L. Muniz, R.T.C. Grounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
as 5:2016cv02431
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) , Z. Ahmed , D. Bright and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Anderson Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gonzalez v. Tuvera et al
as 4:2016cv02294
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Gonzalez
Defendant:
F. Tuvera, E. Bridgnell, Orfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bright v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv03053
Plaintiff:
Franklin D. Bright
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRADLEY v. BRYSON et al
as 3:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL BRADLEY
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON, WILLIAM A PRIOR, JR and FREDRIC D BRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fralick v. Spearman et al
as 5:2015cv04949
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Alan Fralick
Defendant:
Spearman, D. Bright, Poggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Bright et al
as 3:2015cv03277
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Gray
Defendant:
D. Bright, G. Kalisher and J. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
