Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Clark et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2019cv01085
Defendant:
Vale Oregon Irrigation District and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Rebecca D. Clark and Bryon O. Clark
French v. Brown et al
as 2:2016cv00668
Defendant:
Judge Anne Brown, Judge Mark D. Clarke, Judge Michael H. Simon and others
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes v. Panner et al
as 1:2015cv00797
Defendant:
Mark D Clarke and Owen M Panner
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Everist v. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service et al
as 1:2014cv00199
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Director Dayne Barron, City of Medford, Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
David D. Everist
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent - Right to Compensation
Harris v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv02219
Defendant:
Mark D. Clarke, Cody J. Elliott, Ron Grensky and others
Plaintiff:
Earl C. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Abel et al
as 3:2011cv01178
Defendant:
Gregory E. Abel, Wedge Abels, Shane E. Abma and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00602
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Clark v. Hartford Life Insurance Company and the Contact Lumber Company Long Term Disability Plan
as 3:2009cv00866
Plaintiff:
Roy D. Clark and Roy D. Clark
Defendant:
Hartford Life Insurance Company and the Contact Lumber Company Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Keyter v. Haggerty et al
as 3:2008cv00545
Plaintiff:
Anthony Keyter
Defendant:
Ancer L. Haggerty, Ann Aiken, Garr M. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
