Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jerone Alexander
Defendant:
Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 1:2023cv01576
Petitioner:
Albert D. Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Davis v. USA
as 1:2019cv01560
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Germain D. Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis v. Budish et al
as 1:2019cv00555
Defendant:
Emily McNeeley, Ken Mills, Eric Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Zeehandelar Sebation & Associates
as 1:2018cv00783
Defendant:
Zeehandelar Sebation & Associates
Plaintiff:
Jeremy D Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Reinvest Consultants, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00782
Defendant:
Robert TR Dressman and Reinvest Consultants, LLC
Plaintiff:
Stephanie D Kinley and Jeremy D Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Armstrong et al v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen - NS Southern Lines GCA et al
as 1:2016cv01664
Plaintiff:
Armstrong, Nicholas D Davis, Mathew C Taylor and others
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen - NS Southern Lines GCA, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen -- NS Eastern Lines GCA and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Davis v. USA
as 1:2016cv01601
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Terrance D. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2016dp20090
Plaintiff:
Marcelle D. Davis and Thomas Phillip Davis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limted and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
