Cases 1 - 10 of 366
Kelly v. Dixon (Volusia)
as 6:2024cv00830
Petitioner:
Ricky Raynard Kelly
Respondent:
Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. The Texas Department of Public Safety et al
as 4:2024cv01624
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Dixon
Defendant:
The Texas Department of Public Safety, Homeland Security Investigations, Air Force Office of Special Investigations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fossett v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Manatee County)
as 8:2024cv00981
Petitioner:
Peter Fossett
Respondent:
Ashley B. Moody and Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
MICHEAL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRITTEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
CORDERRO R BRITTEN
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, CONNER and SPREAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TYRONE SIMMONS
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, GARY HEWETT and D BURCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ENGLISH v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
CORDARREL ENGLISH
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
EDWARD LEE BROWN
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCGLAUN v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
JOHN EDWARD MCGLAUN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
