Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Douglas v. Woodford County et al
as 1:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Douglas
Defendant:
Woodford County, Woodford County Board and Charles Feeney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Douglas v. Pugh
as 1:2013cv01037
Petitioner:
Roderick D Douglas
Respondent:
Jeffrey Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Douglas v. Pugh et al
as 1:2013cv00997
Petitioner:
Roderick D Douglas
Respondent:
Jeffrey Pugh and Edward F Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Douglas, Roderick v. Wall, Edward et al
as 3:2013cv00301
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Douglas
Defendant:
Edward F. Wall , Jon/Jane Doe, Jim Schwochert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Clark et al
as 1:2012cv01116
Plaintiff:
Roderick D Douglas
Defendant:
David Clark, John/Jane Doe, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Milwaukee County Jail et al
as 1:2012cv01117
Plaintiff:
Roderick D Douglas
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail, David Clark, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alonso v. Weiss et al
as 1:2012cv07373
Plaintiff:
Michael Alonso , Altholtz Family Limited Partnership , Lawrence Altholtz and others
Defendant:
Leslie J Weiss, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Nutmeg Group, LLC, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Douglas v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2012cv06745
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Douglas
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and The Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv03315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
