Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Koester v. Perrysburg Pet Lodge & Spa, et al.
as 3:2026cv00959
Plaintiff:
Kristie Lynn Koester
Defendant:
Perrysburg Pet Lodge & Spa and Kendall Goodell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lee et al v. Uihlein et al
as 1:2026cv02242
Plaintiff:
Frederick Donnell Lee
Defendant:
Richard Uihlein, Brian Uihlein, Liz Uihlein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Emrit, et al. v. Dogg, et al.
as 26-1803
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT, United Emrits of America, SATISH DAT BEAST, Former Client of Larry Birkhead Attorney Nancy Hass of Hallandale Beach, Florida as Family Law Attorney and others
Defendant:
SNOOP DOGG, Marijuana Smoker named Calvin Broadus, STATE OF ARIZONA, The Only State Which Did not Approve of the Holiday for the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Junior, NBCUNIVERSAL, LLC and others
Winkhaus et al. v. McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal & Liffman Co., LPA et al.
as 1:2026cv00651
Plaintiff:
Gwenn Winkhaus, Christa K. Goodell and Lisa R. Kalberer
Defendant:
McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal & Liffman Co., LPA and John S. Seich, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Emrit v. Dogg, et al.
as 26-1494
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT, aka Satish Dat Beast, aka Go Go Stish and United Emrits of America
Defendant:
SNOOP DOGG, (Marijuana Smoker named Calvin Broadus); Snoop Doggy Dog Bowl in Arizona, STATE OF ARIZONA, (The Only State Which Did not Approve of the Holiday for the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Junior), NBCUNIVERSAL, LLC and others
Emrit v. Dogg, et al.
as 26-1503
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT and United Emrits of America
Defendant:
SNOOP DOGG, (Marijuana Smoker named Calvin Broadus), STATE OF ARIZONA, (The Only State Which Did not Approve of the Holiday for the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Junior, NBCUNIVERSAL, LLC and others
Tsering et al v. Phoenix Rizing, Inc, dba PhoenixEcom et al
as 0:2026cv60701
Plaintiff:
Dolma Tsering, Steven Robinson, Steadfast178, LLC and others
Defendant:
Hack Distribution, LLC, Alex Goodell, Jared Plotka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Emrit v. Snoop Doggy Dogg, et al
as 26-4019
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SNOOP DOGGY DOGG, SNOOP DOGGY DOGG BOWL IN ARIZONA, THE RACIST STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Emrit v. Melber et al
as 1:2026cv00254
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit, Satish Dat Beast and Go Go Satish
Defendant:
Ari Melber, Universal Music Group, NBC Universal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emrit, et al. v. Dogg, et al.
as 26-884
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Former Client of "Larry Birkhead Attorney" Nancy Hass of Hallandale Beach, Florida as Family Law Attorney, United Emrits of America, SATISH DAT BEAST, Former Client of Paul Gardner, Esquire of Gardner Law Group of Baltimore, Maryland as Entertainment Attorney for Outkast, Mya, Mos Def, Tommy Davidson, and Salahis and others
Defendant:
SNOOP DOGG, Marijuana Smoker named Calvin Broadus, SNOOP DOGG, Bowl in Arizona, The Racist STATE OF ARIZONA, The Only State Which Did not Approve of the Holiday for the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Junior and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
