Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HOWELL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2015cv05604
Plaintiff:
PATSY N. HOWELL and PHILIP D. HOWELL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv52851
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. HOWELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOWELL et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64597
Plaintiff:
RONALD HOWELL and NANCY D HOWELL
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWELL v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32506
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. HOWELL
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. HOWELL
as 1:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DANIEL KAPP
Defendant:
FLOYD D. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
HOWELL et al v. A.C. AND S. INC. et al
as 2:2009cv82790
Defendant:
WEIL MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., FEDERAL MOGUL PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EVELYN HOWELL and JOHN D. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWELL et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00282
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. HOWELL, WOODROW A. JONES, PATRICIA NICHOLS and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HOWELL v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2008cv04946
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY and PROSECUTOR OF HUDSON COUNTY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HOWELL v. McLEAN et al
as 2:2008cv01348
Plaintiff:
HOWARD D. HOWELL
Defendant:
PATRICIA McLEAN, JOHN ELASH, COMMISSIONER AND STAFF OF BUTLER COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HOWELL v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71801
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. HOWELL
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
