Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Jackson v. Perry et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Trevelis D. Jackson
Defendant:
Counselor Perry, Correctional Officer Guyton, Sgt. Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. BOBBITT et al
as 1:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
TREVELIS D JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN BOBBITT, DEPUTY WARDEN PEOPLES, OFFICER MARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Kennin D. Jackson
Defendant:
Deputy Johnson, Deputy Williams, Cpl. Colemen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01622
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Lee v. Jackson et al
as 4:2020cv00201
Defendant:
Detective Brian D. Jackson and Richard A. Sanders
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sentelle Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Jackson et al
as 1:2020cv01366
Defendant:
Bulkmatic, LLC, John Doe Corporations 1-3, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and others
Plaintiff:
Krysten Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Motor Vehicle
Paul v. City of Bloomingdale et al
as 4:2019cv00212
Defendant:
Officer Michael Amos, Officer Matthew R. Davis, John Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Paul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03643
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jackson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01121
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chattahooche Shoals Investment Group, LLC v. Jackson
as 1:2019cv00033
Plaintiff:
Chattahooche Shoals Investment Group, LLC
Defendant:
Samuel D. Jackson and Nathaniel Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
