Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Coppolella et al
as 3:2019cv01009
Plaintiff:
Anthony C. Coppolella, Kenneth D. King, Melissa A. Hersch and others
Defendant:
Nordic Contracting Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coppolella et al v. Aroca et al
as 3:2019cv00303
Plaintiff:
Kelli S. Coppolella, Melissa A. Hersch, Anthony C. Coppolella and others
Defendant:
Multi-Phase Electrical Services, Inc., Diego I. Aroca and NYC Stone Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. ESPER
as 2:2019cv00072
Plaintiff:
MARSHA D. KING
Defendant:
DR. MARK T. ESPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv06445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
King v. USA
as 4:2012cv00411
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard D. King, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
KING et al v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv64087
Plaintiff:
BONNIE J KING , MICHAEL F KING , WILLIAM A KING and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, DANIEL E DELBERT, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv32218
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE D. KING
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
KING et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81872
Plaintiff:
SHARRON L. KING and CARL D. KING
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv50860
Plaintiff:
WILLIE D KING
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
