Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Murray McIver v. SSA Commissioner et al
as 1:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Tamicko D. Murray McIver
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner, SSA New Rochelle Office and Albert Hor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Murray McIver v. Yonkers Mayor et al
as 1:2021cv01251
Defendant:
Donald, Yonkers Police Dept., Justin Kirby and others
Plaintiff:
Tamicko D. Murray McIver and Tamicko Murray McIver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McIver v. HRA-Fair Hearing et al
as 1:2021cv00781
Plaintiff:
Tamicko D. Murray-McIver and Tamicko D. Murray McIver
Defendant:
NYC Homeless Unit Coalition for the Homeless Bruckner Family Shelter and HRA-Fair Hearing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans v. Murray et al
as 9:2014cv00952
Plaintiff:
Shawn Evans
Defendant:
D. Murray, J. Yung and N. Mattie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Graham et al
as 9:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
Santiago Gomez
Defendant:
Harold D. Graham and D. Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. National Review Incorporated
as 12-793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Adrian D. Murray
Defendant - Appellee:
James X. Kilbridge, Erik ZenHausern, Jack Fowler and others
Murray v. National Review Incorporated
as 12-790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Adrian D. Murray
Defendant - Appellee:
James X. Kilbridge, Erik ZenHausern, Jack Fowler and others
Murray v. National Review Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01501
Plaintiff:
Adrian D. Murray
Defendant:
National Review Inc., Erik ZenHausern, Jack Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Secretary of Health & Human Se
as 10-3300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charlyn D. Murray
Defendant - Appellee:
Secretary of Health & Human Services, Michael Leavitt
Murray v. Jacobs et al
as 6:2004cv06231
Plaintiff:
James D. Murray, III
Defendant:
Jacobs , Marlark , Rosemary Matias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
