Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Thomas Dewald v. French, et al
as 23-3268
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDREW DEWALD
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRENCH, Franklin County Prison, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER REED, Franklin County Prison, LIEUTENANT GARY ARTER and others
Lawrence v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, Frederick A. Henderson, William F. Austen and others
Dewald v. French et al
as 1:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Dewald
Defendant:
Correctional Officer French, Correctional Officer Reed, Lieutenant Gary Arter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYERS v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00069
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER D. MYERS
Defendant:
KANSKY DELISMA and ERIC TICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
The United States Of America v. Myers
as 1:2018cv01398
Plaintiff:
The United States Of America
Defendant:
Zachariah D. Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Palazzo v. Cascadian Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00276
Plaintiff:
Richard Palazzo
Defendant:
Cascadian Therapeutics, Inc., Christopher S. Henney, Robert W. Azelby and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Kim v. Cascadian Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00250
Plaintiff:
David Kim
Defendant:
Cascadian Therapeutics, Inc., Christopher S. Henney, Robert W. Azelby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv01520
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2016cv02280
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffery A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MYERS v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2016cv05083
Plaintiff:
DANIEL D. MYERS
Defendant:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, KAREN NYCE, KIMBERLY A. BERKELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
