Cases 1 - 10 of 13
(PC) Dorton v. Tostonie, et al.
as 1:2023cv01784
Plaintiff:
Fred Dorton
Defendant:
Steve Tostonie, J Kimes, D. Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Superior Court, County of Humboldt
as 5:2023cv04018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel D. Pierce
Defendant:
Superior Court, County of Humboldt, Humboldt County Correction Facility, Sheriff Department County of Mendocino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milton et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation CTF- Soledad et al
as 4:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
William Milton, Vickter Estrada, William Pardue and others
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and REhabilitation CTF- Soledad, Craig Alan Koenig, Blake R Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv00479
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wayne Wilson
Defendant:
D. Pierce, R. Mayo, T. Meighan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Pierce et al
as 3:2016cv00718
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wayne Wilson
Defendant:
D. Pierce, R. Mayo, T. Meighan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03630
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0294
Pierce v. People of the State of California
as 1:2013cv00235
Petitioner:
Robert D. Pierce
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Pierce
as 3:2012cv02448
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Paul D. Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402
Catanzarite v. Pierce et al
as 1:2012cv01502
Plaintiff:
John Catanzarite
Defendant:
D. Pierce, M. Carrasco, F. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
