Cases 11 - 20 of 356
RONEY v. SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
RAHSHAD RONEY
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, LT. D. PHILLIPS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harris v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
S Rodriguez, Anya, M. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. USA
as 1:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Remon D Phillips
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gonzalez v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Balam Eugenio Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden Brian D. Phillips and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Cramer v. Macomber et al
as 1:2023cv01712
Plaintiff:
James Cramer
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Kathleen Allison, Theresa Cisneros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Harris v. Phillips et al
as 1:2023cv01713
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
B. D. Phillips, L. Delafuente, E. Espalin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew David Herrera v. Bryan D. Phillips
as 8:2023cv02327
Petitioner:
Matthew David Herrera
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cappello v. Cisneros, et al.
as 23-3988
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK WILLIAM CAPPELLO
Respondent / Appellee:
TERESA CISNEROS and BRIAN D. PHILLIPS, Warden
(PC) Harris v. Phillips
as 1:2023cv01677
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
Byan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miguel Flores Jr. v. Bryan D. Phillips
as 2:2023cv09998
Petitioner:
Miguel Flores, Jr.
Respondent:
Acting Warden Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
