Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Phillips v. Strack et al
as 1:2024cv02100
Plaintiff:
Dezzan D. Phillips
Defendant:
Daina Strack, Ben Slocum, Jason Edgecomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Holland
as 1:2024cv01952
Plaintiff:
Dezzan D. Phillips
Defendant:
Scott T. Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Edgcomb et al
as 1:2024cv01890
Petitioner:
Dezzan D Phillips
Respondent:
LaSalle County Jail and Jason Edgcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Saul
as 1:2020cv04698
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Matoria D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Newton Partners, LP v. Fundi Fuels, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00477
Defendant:
Fundi Fuels, LLC, Brandon D. Phillips Living Trust Dated August 8, 2005 and Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants
Plaintiff:
Newton Partners, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv09058
Plaintiff:
Matoria D. Phillips
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv06439
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, M Abernathy, D Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sass v. Gasco Developement, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv03165
Plaintiff:
James L Sass
Defendant:
Gasco Developement, LLC, Scott D Phillips, Fred H Kientzle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Phillips v. Phoenix Police Dept. et al
as 1:2010cv00234
Plaintiff:
Survitis D. Phillips
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Dept. and Bennie Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
