Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Stewart v. King et al
as 3:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
Lamor D. Stewart
Defendant:
Ronald King, Warden Jackson, Warden Vigliate and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. John Doe
as 3:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Lamor D. Stewart
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Finkley et al
as 1:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
James D. Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Finkley, MDOC Corrections, Jackson County, MS and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2019cv00780
Plaintiff:
Barry Rushing, Cathy Tarver, Barney Rosemon and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Stewart v. Safeway Insurance Company
as 3:2019cv00155
Defendant:
Safeway Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Angels D. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Stewart v. USA
as 3:2016cv00252
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marshun D. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stewart v. County of Coahoma County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
Marco D. Stewart
Defendant:
County of Coahoma County, Mississippi , City of Clarksdale, Mississippi, John Rybolt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hartley et al v. Freese & Goss, et al
as 3:2014cv00600
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Hartley , Minnie Copeland , Hazel Thigpen and others
Defendant:
Freese & Goss, PLLC , Richard A. Freese , Dennis C. Sweet, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Stewart v. USA
as 3:2013cv00103
Petitioner:
Marshun D. Stewart
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
