Cases 1 - 10 of 31
U.S. Bank Trust Company, et al v. Soto et al
as 4:2023cv02444
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee, as Successor-in-Interest to U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Registered Holders of MASTR Asset Backed Securities Trust, 200 and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association
Defendant:
Manuel D. Soto, Jr. and Francine Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Soto Rios v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 8:2022cv01089
Plaintiff:
Carmen D. Soto Rios
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Soto Rios v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 5:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Carmen D. Soto Rios
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Felipe D. Soto v. Joshua Epstein et al
as 2:2021cv01176
Defendant:
Jeremy Esswein and Joshua Epstein
Plaintiff:
Felipe D. Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv27735
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HAROLD D SOTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01847
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Soto v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv06913
Plaintiff:
Maria D. Soto
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
George Howard Wilson v. J.D. Soto et al
as 2:2015cv09546
Defendant:
G. Biaggini, G. Biaggini, J. Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
George Howard Wilson
Homer Tyrone Lewis v. J. D. Soto et al
as 2:2015cv02938
Defendant:
G. Biaggini, G. Biaggini, J. Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Homer Tyrone Lewis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01475
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
