Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Thomas v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Dedra D. Thomas
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Delaware)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rossetti v. City of South Fulton, Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv04474
Plaintiff:
Justin Daniel Rossetti
Defendant:
City of South Fulton, Georgia, Officer R. McCain, Officer A. Jackson and others
Goodman et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv03057
Plaintiff:
Valancia Goodman and Gregory Maloy
Defendant:
Sheriff/Chief Deputy Levon Allen, Chief Deputy / Sheri Roland Boehrer, Jail Adminisrator Terrance Gibson and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Jail Officer F. Radford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. BARRY et al
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
ARDENTRIC D JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BARRY, SGT SAMANTHA BROWN, MEDICAL DIRECTOR OATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. White et al
as 3:2021cv00044
Plaintiff:
Corey D. Thomas
Defendant:
Jermaine White, Jacob Beasley, Veronica Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. James et al
as 4:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Captain Blanton, CPL Kelly James, CPL Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
Savon R. D. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGE v. ALLEN et al
as 6:2020cv00087
Petitioner:
D THOMAS PAGE
Respondent:
Marty Allen and State of Georgia
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PAGE v. ALLEN et al
as 5:2020cv00219
Petitioner:
D THOMAS PAGE
Respondent:
MARTY ALLEN and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Page v. Allen
as 1:2019cv01922
Plaintiff:
D. Thomas Page
Defendant:
Marty Allen and Marilyn Primovic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Page v. Allen
as 1:2018cv04056
Respondent:
Marty Allen
Petitioner:
D. Thomas Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
