Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Schwartz et al
as 1:2023cv01736
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Williams
Defendant:
John Doe Schwartz, Lieutenant R. Keen, Lieutenant John Doe Frisk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
IN RE: JONATHAN D. WILLIAMS
as 2:2023cv03941
In Re:
JONATHAN D WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams-Redding v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01075
Plaintiff:
Edda D. Williams-Redding
Defendant:
SoClean, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
SCOTT v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATERMAN v. DOMTAR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv03164
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
DOMTAR CORPORATION, ROBERT E APPLE, GIANNELLA ALVAREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WILLIAMS v. GLASSBORO POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2021cv01666
Defendant:
CPL. JULIE HOWERY and GLASSBORO POLICE DEPT.
Plaintiff:
GARY D. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartshorn et al v. Williams et al
as 4:2019cv02145
Defendant:
Diesel Express, Big M. Transportation, Desaira D. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Hartshorn and Diane Hartshorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coit v. Luther et al
as 1:2019cv02036
Defendant:
Lisa Hollibaugh, Ellenberger, Saunderland and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
