Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Young v. Rettig et al
as 7:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dwayne D. Young
Defendant:
Charles T. Rettig, John Koskinen, Nina Bolin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Richard L. Anderson, Morton Blackwell, Patricia Bast Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballance et al v. Rettig et al
as 7:2021cv00646
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Ballance, Aaron D. Ellis, Dwayne D. Young and others
Defendant:
Charles T. Rettig, John Koskinen, Nina Bolin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ofori v. Fleming et al
as 7:2020cv00345
Defendant:
M. L. Daniel, S. R. Farmer, Combs and others
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ofori v. Fleming et al
as 7:2020cv00344
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Mitchell, Combs, Leslie J. Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ofori v. Clarke et al
as 7:2020cv00343
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson, Combs and others
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Peumansend Creek Regional Jail
as 1:2015cv00264
Defendant:
Peumansend Creek Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Dorian D. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Angliker et al
as 7:2012cv00110
Defendant:
C. J. Angliker and Commonwealth
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. The People of Arlington, Virginia
as 7:2012cv00088
Respondent:
The People of Arlington, Virginia
Petitioner:
Marcus D. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
