Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Beach v. City of Roanoke et al
as 7:2021cv00326
Defendant:
Carilion Police Department, Sgt. William Hodges, City of Roanoke and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Beach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allen v. Waldron et al
as 7:2021cv00214
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Kevin McCoy, T. Lowe and others
Plaintiff:
Karsten O. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCloud v. Davis, et al
as 4:2021cv00015
Plaintiff:
Michael McCloud
Defendant:
D.B. Frye, Jr. and Thomas R. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
D.B., an Infant, By and Through His Parents and Next Friends, Deardre D. Bebeau and Daniel J. Bebeau, Sr. et al v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv00291
Plaintiff:
D.B., an Infant, By and Through His Parents and Next Friends, Deardre D. Bebeau and Daniel J. Bebeau, Sr. , Deardre D. Bebeau and Daniel J. Bebeau, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2680
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon, Corporation, NB
as 1:2012cv01230
Plaintiff:
Cecil D.B. King, Jr. , Cecilia King Gantt , Charlene King Perdue and others
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon, Corporation, NB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Negotiable Instrument
Hill v. Smith et al
as 2:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
D.B. Smith, Richard Davis, III and Commonwealth State of VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coles v. Everett et al
as 2:2008cv00493
Petitioner:
Corey Coles
Respondent:
D.B. Everett, Gene Johnson and John Jabe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coles v. Everett et al
as 2:2008cv00375
Petitioner:
Corey Coles
Respondent:
D.B. Everett, John Jabe and Gene Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coles v. Everett
as 2:2008cv00225
Petitioner:
Corey Coles
Respondent:
D.B. Everett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
