Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Rodgers v. Drew et al
as 9:2014cv00406
Plaintiff:
Danyl Rodgers
Defendant:
D.B. Drew, Hemendez, Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simmons v. Staff at USP-Coleman (2) et al
as 5:2012cv00315
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Simmons
Defendant:
Staff at USP-Coleman (2), K. Cimock, FNU Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simmons v. Staff at USP-Coleman (2) et al
as 3:2012cv00807
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Simmons
Defendant:
Staff at USP-Coleman (2), K Cimock, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abuhouran v. Warden FCI RayBrook
as 11-2292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Aktham Abuhouran
Defendant:
Warden FCI RayBrook, Health Services Administrator, FCI Raybrook, NY and Physicians at FCI Raybrook
Defendant - Appellee:
D. Marini, M.D., Clinical Director at FCI Raybrook, S. Liberty, Physician's Assistant, B. Darrah, Unit Manager and others
James Crawford v. D.B. Drew
as 11-5072
Petitioner - Appellant:
James B. Crawford
Respondent - Appellee:
D.B. Drew
Bailey v. Lappin et al
as 3:2011cv00578
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin, Connelly, Delbert G. Sauers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Honesty-Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2010cv00312
Plaintiff:
John M. Honesty-Bey
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and D.B. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reynolds v. Jarvis et al
as 5:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
William O. Reynolds
Defendant:
Tamyra Jarvis, D.B. Drew and FNU Flournoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
CRAWFORD v. DREW
as 1:2009cv02447
Petitioner:
JAMES B. CRAWFORD
Respondent:
D.B. DREW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bailey v. Lappin et al
as 5:2009cv00382
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Raymond E. Holt, D.B. Drew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
