Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02308
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jane Doe PNA (D.S.)2 v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2026cv05557
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe PNA (D.S.)2
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc, Rasier CA - LLC and Rasier LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jane Doe PNA (D.S.)1 v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2026cv05412
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe PNA (D.S.)1
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc, Rasier CA, LLC and Rasier LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D.S. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv02650
Plaintiff:
D.S.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
D.S. v. United States of America et al
as 3:2026cv01918
Plaintiff:
D.S.
Defendant:
United States of America and Ray Garcia
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Rustamova, et al v. Blanche
as 26-1225
Petitioner:
SAADAT SAKHAVAT GIZI RUSTAMOVA, SARVAN SHIRZADOV and D.S.
Respondent:
PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General and TODD W. BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
