Cases 11 - 20 of 128
Sheltra v. Christensen et al
as 1:2020cv00215
Defendant:
Cpl Frahs, Jay Christensen, C/O Craig and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Sheltra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Durazo #151337 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv04588
Defendant:
Unknown Larson, Charles L Ryan, D.W. Rode and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Durazo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linwood v. Green et al
as 1:2019cv00040
Defendant:
D.W. Nodland and Tom Green
Plaintiff:
Eugene Allen Linwood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mixon v. Neven et al
as 2:2017cv02292
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Antonio Lee Mixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Blades et al
as 1:2017cv00323
Plaintiff:
William D Butler
Defendant:
Randy Blades, D.W. McKay, James Fraiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Cox et al
as 1:2017cv00318
Plaintiff:
Anthony Barber
Defendant:
Cox, Nicodemus, D.W. McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Bibbins v. Unknown Party, et al
as 17-15746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN JOSEPH BIBBINS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Legal Access Monitor at Tucson Complex, JULIA ERWIN, Supervisor of Legal Access Monitor at ADOC-ASPC-Tucson, AZ, BETTY ULIBARRI, Paralegal employee of Legal Access Monitor at ADOC-ASPC-Tucson, AZ and others
Richard Richards v. Pannan Day
as 17-15609
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD L. RICHARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
PANNAN DAYS, D.W. Arizona State Prison
Gaines v. Neven et al
as 3:2017cv00140
Petitioner:
Cornelius A. Gaines, III
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and D.W. Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rangel v. State of Nevada ex rel. NDOC et al
as 3:2017cv00128
Defendant:
Vanessa Heidt, Patrick Moreda, Nevada, State Of and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Rangel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
