Cases 1 - 10 of 30
(PC) Smith v. Osmon et al
as 2:2022cv01637
Plaintiff:
Daniel Roy Smith
Defendant:
Osmon, Angie Hood-Medland, Deepak Mohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv05646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Daniel W. Smith et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
as 2:2021cv04312
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Smith and Taylor Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Daniel Ray Smith v. City of Redondo Beach
as 2:2020cv07640
Defendant:
City of Redondo Beach and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
D.H. Smith Company, Inc. et al v. Continental Casualty Company
as 5:2020cv04884
Plaintiff:
D.H. Smith Company, Inc. and Daniel H Smith, III
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bratton v. Broomfield et al
as 5:2020cv03885
Defendant:
Dr. Sandler, C. Young, A. Maxfield and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Bratton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velton Lamont Boone v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 4:2020cv02129
Plaintiff:
Velton Lamont Boone
Defendant:
Warden Kathleen Allison, Warden Ron Davis and Daniel A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velton Lamont Boone v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 2:2020cv02514
Plaintiff:
Velton Lamont Boone
Defendant:
Ron Davis, Daniel A Smith and Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vernacchio v. Davis et al
as 3:2019cv07171
Defendant:
Ron Davis and Daniel A. Smith
Plaintiff:
John F. Vernacchio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Artem Stoliarov v. Marshmello Creative, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03934
Defendant:
Universal Polygram International Publishing, Marshmello Creative, LLC, Steven McCutcheon and others
Plaintiff:
Artem Stoliarov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
