Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Simon v. DeSantis et al
as 1:2023cv20567
Plaintiff:
Chrisnel Simon
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, Casey DeSantis, State Attorney Katherine F. Rundle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Levine et al v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04481
Plaintiff:
Mary Levine and Daniel Levine
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tara Hogate Livingston et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05042
Plaintiff:
Tara Hogate Livingston, Angel Johnson, Mira Kacor and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Livingston et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00834
Plaintiff:
Livingston, Tara Hogate Livingston, Angel Johnson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Livingston et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00834
Plaintiff:
Tara Hogate Livingston, Angel Johnson, Mira Kacor and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Beltran v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Shivon Beltran
Defendant:
City of Austin, John Doe, Nikolas Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Levine et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05119
Plaintiff:
Mary Levine and Daniel Levine
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seto et al v. County of San Joaquin
as 2:2020cv01788
Plaintiff:
Nick Taiariol, Shawn Cannon, Daniel Levin and others
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Seto et al v. County of San Joaquin
as 2:2020at00872
Plaintiff:
Nick Taiariol, Shawn Cannon, Daniel Levin and others
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ganeles v. Oaktree Capital Group, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv06231
Defendant:
Robert Denham, Marna Whittington, John Frank and others
Plaintiff:
David Ganeles
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
