Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Daniel Spuck v. Superintendent Mercer SCI, et al
as 15-2766
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT MERCER SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Daniel Spuck v. Thomas Ridge, et al
as 15-2765
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Defendant - Appellee: FORMER GOVERNOR THOMAS RIDGE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PAUL STOWITSKY, Superintendent, SRCF Mercer and others
Daniel Spuck v. Superintendent Mercer SCI
as 15-2623
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT MERCER SCI
Daniel Spuck v. Superintendent Rockview SCI
as 14-4664
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
SPUCK v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2014cv00219
Petitioner: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Respondent: BRIAN THOMPSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Daniel Spuck v. Superintendent Mercer SCI
as 14-2901
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT MERCER SCI
Daniel Spuck v. Superintendent SCI Rockview, et al
as 13-3754
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Defendant - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Daniel Spuck v. Clearfield County Pennsylvania We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2490
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Defendant - Appellee: CLEARFIELD COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
Daniel Spuck v. Joseph Mazurkiewicz
as 13-1632
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Defendant - Appellant: JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ
Defendant - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Daniel Spuck v. Thomas Ridge, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4292
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS RIDGE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PAUL STOWITSKY, Superintenedent, SRCF Mercer and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?