Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Quituisaca v. Schwartz et al
as 7:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Mario Quituisaca
Defendant:
Naomi Shira Schwartz and Daniel Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 md Diversity-Motor Vehicle/Wrongful Death
Matthew Houston v. L.B.B.S., et al
as 23-15810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
L.B.B.S., Termed by ECF No. 5, DANIEL SCHWARTZ, CALVIN JOHNSON and others
Schwartz v. Sacramento Container Company
as 1:2022at00909
Plaintiff:
Daniel Schwartz
Defendant:
Sacramento Container Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Schwartz v. Sacramento Container Company
as 2:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Daniel Schwartz
Defendant:
Sacramento Container Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Houston v. L.B.B.S. et al
as 2:2022cv01780
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
L.B.B.S., Daniel Schwartz, Calvin Johnson and others
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrel et al v. Cadence Premier Cargo Inc et al
as 0:2021cv00236
Plaintiff:
Patrick Carrel and Craig Carrel
Defendant:
Cadence Premier Cargo Inc, Cadence Premier Logistics LLC, Cadence Premier Logistics Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Schwartz et al v. Campbell Soup Co.
as 3:2020cv00647
Plaintiff:
Danielle Schwartz and Haunah Vanlaningham
Defendant:
Campbell Soup Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHWARTZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv15119
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Schwartz v. Bai Brands LLC et al
as 2:2019cv06249
Plaintiff:
Mr. Daniel Schwartz
Defendant:
Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc, Bai Brands LLC, Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
