Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Thomas v. Venegas, Star No. 9624 et al
as 1:2021cv04294
Plaintiff: Christopher Thomas
Defendant: Officer Pedro Venegas, Star No. 9624, Officer Juan Pintor, Star No. 6255 and Officer Daniel Sullivan, Star No. 855
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spence v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2019cv01280
Plaintiff: Gregory Spence
Defendant: Daniel Sullivan and Debbie Isaac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armour v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv03240
Plaintiff: Charles W Armour
Defendant: Tracy Cheatham, Daniel Sullivan, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spence v. Sullivan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00991
Defendant: Wexford Health Services Inc., Tad Van Dyke, Daniel Sullivan and others
Plaintiff: Gregory Spence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armour v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv06042
Plaintiff: Charles W Armour
Defendant: Daniel Sullivan, Illinois Department of Corrections (I.D.O.C.), John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irving v. Sullivan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00557
Defendant: Daniel Sullivan, Hummerhouse, Morgenthaler and others
Plaintiff: Keith R. Irving
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colin v. Gerst et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00494
Plaintiff: Gregorio Colin
Defendant: Daniel Sullivan, Mr. Gerst, Dennis Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannady v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2019cv01656
Respondent: Daniel Sullivan and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Petitioner: Fuzzell A. Cannady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tegume v. Sullivan
as 1:2018cv06130
Petitioner: Moses Tegume
Respondent: Daniel Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tegume v. Sullivan
as 3:2018cv01469
Petitioner: Moses Tegume
Respondent: Daniel Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?