Cases 21 - 30 of 31
WESLEY-EL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2009cv00315
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WESLEY-EL
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR. and CHRISTINA M. GOCHNOUR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WESLEY v. BEARD et al
as 3:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WESLEY
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, DORINA VARNER, NICHOLAS SCHARFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WESLEY v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2009cv00259
Petitioner:
DANIEL WESLEY
Respondent:
GERALD L. ROZUM and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WESLEY v. BEARD et al
as 3:2009cv00208
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WESLEY
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, CINDY WATSON, NICHOLASS SCHARFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WESLEY v. BEARD et al
as 3:2009cv00209
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WESLEY
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, CINDY WATSON, NICHOLASS SCHARFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WESLEY v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2009cv00495
Petitioner:
DANIEL WESLEY
Respondent:
GERALD L. ROZUM, TOM CORBETT, RONALD M. WABBY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Wesley v. Bruce Dixon, et al
as 09-1398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL WESLEY-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE DIXON, MICHAEL PATTERSON, ALGHNY CTY JAIL and others
WESLEY v. GOVERNOR EDWARD G. RENDELL
as 3:2008cv00279
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WESLEY
Defendant:
GOVERNOR EDWARD G. RENDELL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wesley v. Sterling
as 4:2008cv02034
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wesley
Defendant:
Scott Sterling
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wesley v. Sterling et al
as 4:2008cv00492
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wesley
Defendant:
Scott Sterling, Barbara Malewsici and Donna Jones
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
