Cases 31 - 40 of 350
ALLEN v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00125
Petitioner:
DWAYNE K. ALLEN
Respondent:
DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOUGLAS v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00124
Petitioner:
BIATHA DOUGLAS
Respondent:
DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00119
Petitioner:
ALFRED L. DAVIS
Respondent:
DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KONSOER v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00118
Petitioner:
105532 ANTHONY R. KONSOER
Respondent:
DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HESTER v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
CHAD T. HESTER
Respondent:
DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards v. Ind Dept of Corrs et al
as 3:2022cv00581
Plaintiff:
Danny R Richards
Defendant:
Ind Dept of Corrs and Dept of Treasury
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00093
Petitioner:
JEROLE W. ADAMS
Respondent:
DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SAINTIGNON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
DANNY L. SAINTIGNON, JR.
Defendant:
VANIHEL, K. GILMORE, M. ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00087
Defendant:
DANNY MITCHELL
Petitioner:
TYRONE FRAZIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Danny Dawson
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
