Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Downs v. Dennison
as 3:2014cv00265
Petitioner:
Rojuan Michael Downs
Respondent:
Darwin Dennison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Newton v. Dennison et al
as 4:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Kathy Newton
Defendant:
Darwin Dennison, Unknown Agents of Grayson County Detention Center 1 and Unknown Agents of Grayson County Detention Center No. 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Dennison
as 4:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Jose Ventura Diaz
Defendant:
Darwin Dennison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Dennison et al
as 4:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
Sterling Reneva Rivers
Defendant:
Darwin Dennison, Jason Woosley, Gail Basham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Woosley
as 4:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Sterling Reneva Rivers
Defendant:
Jason Woosley, Darwin Dennison, Gail Basham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Krug v. Darwin Dennison, et al
as 12-5689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY C. KRUG
Defendant - Appellee:
DARWIN DENNISON, RITA WISON and GARY EMBRY
Krug v. Dennison et al
as 4:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Gregory C. Krug
Defendant:
Darwin Dennison, Rita Wilson and Gary Embry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert Smith v. USA, et al
as 11-6437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, CAROL PAVILACK GETTY and others
Defendant:
US PAROLE COMMISSION, US MARSHALL SERVICE and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Herbert Smith v. USA, et al
as 11-5966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US PAROLE COMMISSION, US MARSHALL SERVICE and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Shain v. Grayson County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2011cv00084
Plaintiff:
W. Curtis Shain
Defendant:
Grayson County, Kentucky, Darwin Dennison, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
