Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Curtis Brown, Sr. v. Court of Appeals
as 22-6135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS JEROME BROWN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COURT OF APPEALS, JUDGE DAVID C. NORTON, U.S. DISTRICT COURT and others
Brown v. Court of Appeals et al
as 2:2021cv03486
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Brown, Sr
Defendant:
Court of Appeals, Judge David C Norton, U.S. District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Brown, Sr. v. US
as 21-7156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS JEROME BROWN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and others
John Baccus v. Brian Stirling
as 19-6394
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOW MARCHANT, DAVID C. NORTON, T. CONWELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS, a/k/a John Roosevelt Baccus, a/k/a John Baccus Roosevelt
Baccus v. Stirling et al
as 9:2018cv01880
Plaintiff:
John Baccus
Defendant:
Brian P Stirling, Dept of Corrections, N.C. Marchant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Stirling et al
as 8:2018cv01880
Defendant:
David C Norton, Alan M Wilson, Brian P Stirling and others
Plaintiff:
John Baccus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. United States of America et al
as 2:2015cv04065
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Brown, Sr
Defendant:
United States of America, US Probation Dept, US District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Asbury v. David Tartarsky
as 14-6731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE J. ASBURY, a/k/a Sa'id Abdullah Al'Rashid
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID TARTARSKY, DON DRISKELL, JOETTE D. SCARBOROUGH and others
Defendant:
JOHN KINARD, JAMES R. BARBER, III, JOSEPH R. MCCROREY and others
Willie Asbury v. John Kinard
as 14-6639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE J. ASBURY, a/k/a Sa'id Abdullah Al'Rashid
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID TARTARSKY, DON DRISKELL, JOETTE D. SCARBOROUGH and others
John Baccus v. Bristow Marchant
as 14-6517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRISTOW MARCHANT and DAVID C. NORTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
