Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ALEXANDER v. BEARD et al
as 1:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, MICHAEL TKACS, HOOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUKER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
ROBERT AUKER
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS S. FOLINO, IRMA CLISH VIHLIDAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. CHURNEY et al
as 2:2013cv01202
Plaintiff:
FUQUAN Y. HILL
Defendant:
CHURNEY, HUDOCK, F. NUNEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REID-DOUGLAS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv00500
Plaintiff:
STEVEN REID-DOUGLAS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DAVID PINKETT, LOUIS S. FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Grainey et al
as 3:2012cv02470
Plaintiff:
Nathan Riley
Defendant:
David Grainey, Michael Smith, Mark Cappoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAY v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2012cv00985
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK T. RAY
Defendant:
JEFF ROGERS, DAVID MITCHELL, COI HARKLEROAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Robert Rega, et al
as 12-2513
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT GENE REGA
Defendant - Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, LOUIS FOLINO, JEFFREY MARTIN and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
TERRENCE F. MCVERRY
In re: Robert Gene Rega
as 11-4008
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT GENE REGA
Defendant - Respondent:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LOUIS FOLINO, Superintendent/S.C.I. Greene, JEFFREY MARTIN, Captian and others
Nominal Respondent:
TERRENCE F. MCVERRY
YOUNG v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv00284
Plaintiff:
LEONARD G. YOUNG, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, DORINA VARNER, JEFFREY MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CALDWELL v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2009cv00492
Plaintiff:
CLAY CALDWELL
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, JEFFREY A. BEARD, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
