Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Walker v. Marathon GBR et al
as 4:2023cv01307
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Marathon GBR, Jeffrey Cornelius, City Of Texas City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Walker v. Marathon GBR et al
as 2:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Marathon GBR, Jeffrey Cornelius, City of Texas City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Malone v. M&M Diversified, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
David Malone
Defendant:
M&M Diversified, Inc., Marc Buyers and Abee Buyers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Malone v. M&M Diversified, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00678
Plaintiff:
David Malone
Defendant:
M&M Diversified, Inc., Marc Buyers and Abee Buyers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Malone v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01297
Plaintiff:
David Malone
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho, LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrette et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2015cv06941
Plaintiff:
Stephen Barrette , Anel Escobar , Lisa Gilbert and others
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Pharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrew Malone, Jr. v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-10108
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID MALONE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Malone, Jr. v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv02759
Petitioner:
Andrew David Malone, Jr.
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins et al v. Saint-Gobain Containers Inc et al
as 3:2012cv01439
Plaintiff:
Charles R Jenkins , Warren Alford , Thomas W Archie and others
Defendant:
Saint Gobain Containers Inc , T B G Inc, Indian Head Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
