Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Davison v. Barrasse et al
as 4:2010cv01837
Petitioner:
David N. Davison
Respondent:
Michael Barrasse, Todd Ferritti, Donate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruiz v. Sneizeck et al
as 1:2010cv01664
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruiz
Defendant:
T.R. Sneizeck, Eileen Falzini, John D. Mannetti, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Sneizeck, et al.
as 1:2010cv01663
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Defendant:
T.R. Sneizeck, Eileen Falzini, Kenton Hubble and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carpenter v. Sneizeck et al
as 1:2010cv01665
Plaintiff:
Gay Carpenter
Defendant:
T.R. Sneizeck, Marye Wambach, Eileen Falzini and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. EQUITY et al
as 1:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BROWN
Defendant:
EQUITY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMMON PLEAS COURT, PHILA. PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBISON et al v. THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2010cv00056
Plaintiff:
DAVID N. ROBISON and MARY PAT ROBISON
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Murphy v. Berdanier et al
as 1:2009cv01127
Plaintiff:
David N. Murphy
Defendant:
Gene Berdanier, Dave Wapinsky, Michael Flannery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. NESTOR et al
as 1:2009cv00934
Plaintiff:
David N. Murphy, Sr.
Defendant:
Matthew R. Nestor, The Borough Of Shenandoah, Schuylkill County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. NESTOR et al
as 2:2009cv01439
Plaintiff:
DAVID N. MURPHY, SR.
Defendant:
MATTHEW R. NESTOR, THE BOROUGH OF SHENANDOAH, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
