Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Morriss v. Pedro et al
as 2:2026cv01162
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Blake Morriss
Defendant:
David Pedro, J. Couture and Robenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Highberger et al
as 2:2026cv00943
Plaintiff:
Michael Allan Ramirez
Defendant:
J. Highberger, David Pedro, I. Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeBellis v. Miller et al
as 2:2026cv00898
Plaintiff:
Vincent Anthony DeBellis
Defendant:
Captain Paul Miller, Super Int. David Pedro and Officer Amanda Litzinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tistoj-lopez v. Pedro
as 2:2026cv00662
Petitioner:
Erasmo Eli Tistoj-lopez
Respondent:
David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larsen v. Reese et al
as 2:2026cv00620
Plaintiff:
Steven Larsen
Defendant:
Mike Reese, Superintendant David Pedro, Bobby Rabb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02130
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Zambrano v. Oregon Department of Corrections, et al.
as 26-1511
Defendant:
COLETTE S. PETERS, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ODOC, OREGON CORRECTIONS ENTERPRISE, a semi-independent state agency and others
Plaintiff:
SERGIO MIGUEL ZAMBRANO
Wood v. Reese et al
as 2:2026cv00430
Plaintiff:
Lance Conway Wood and Renee Anderson
Defendant:
Mike Reese, Gary Niman, Brain Stephen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Pedro
as 2:2026cv00272
Petitioner:
Joshua Shane Harmon
Respondent:
David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyes v. Pedro
as 2:2026cv00204
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Reyes
Respondent:
David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
