Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Grieb et al v. LaSalle Corrections LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Jason Brian Grieb, Angel Espinoza and Fernando Ramirez
Defendant:
LaSalle Corrections LLC, Lasalle Corrections West LLC, Ramon Velez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00945
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Krebs v. Schriro et al
as 2:2010cv01281
Plaintiff:
Robert F Krebs
Defendant:
Dora B Schriro, David Rivas and Alfred Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2009cv00094
Petitioner:
Freddie Lee Thornton
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, David Rivas and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Frost v. Schriro et al
as 2:2008cv01559
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ludwig Frost
Defendant:
Dora Schriro, Dona Markley, John Hallahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herring v. Schriro et al
as 2:2008cv01249
Plaintiff:
George Devon Herring
Defendant:
Dora B Schriro, Richard Pratt, Romweber and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chase v. Rivas et al
as 2:2008cv00402
Petitioner:
Kerry Allynn Chase
Respondent:
David Rivas and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chase v. Rivas et al
as 2:2008cv00275
Petitioner:
Kerry Allynn Chase
Respondent:
David Rivas and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norris v. Rivas et al
as 4:2008cv00110
Petitioner:
Michael Cory Norris
Respondent:
David Rivas and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trenton v. Schriro et al
as 2:2007cv02050
Plaintiff:
Joseph Amaziah Trenton
Defendant:
Dora B. Schriro, Bennie Rollins, David Rivas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
