Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Rodriguez-De Jesus v. USA
as 3:2011cv01787
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez-De Jesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. GEO Group Central Texas Facility et al
as 5:2011cv00261
Defendant:
FNU Baladeras, Brent Bemont, GEO Central Texas Facility Medical Doctor/Staff and others
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Zwicke et al
as 5:2011cv00260
Defendant:
Robert Hernandez, D. Irwin, C. Kent and others
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2011cv00393
Petitioner:
DAVID RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
GERALD L. ROZUM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Salinas v. Texas Parole Board
as 5:2010cv00984
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez Salinas
Respondent:
Texas Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2010cv03775
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Rodriguez
as 1:2010cv05077
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
David Rodriguez v. Vernon Lewis, et al
as 10-20484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
VERNON LYDELL LEWIS, AUSA and ABRAN MARTINEZ, AUSA
Rodriguez v. New York State Department of Correctional Services et al
as 6:2009cv06511
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
New York State Department of Correctional Services, Lester Wright, Jacqueline Levitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Lewis et al
as 4:2009cv03235
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Vernon L Lewis and Abran Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
