Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GLOVER v. OWENS et al
as 1:2021cv20714
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANTHONY GLOVER
Defendant:
DAVID S. OWENS, JR., KAREN TAYLOR and JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv13805
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BROWN
Defendant:
JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR., DAVID S. OWEN, JR., KAREN TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL et al v. DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2020cv06133
Plaintiff:
SE'KOU ABU MALIK MENEL EL and SUTEN KHAI BARUTI CHE EL
Defendant:
JUDGE STEVEN P. BURKETT, CAMDEN COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CAPTAIN CHARLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAGGART v. OWENS et al
as 1:2019cv01089
Defendant:
LOUIS CAPELLI, JR. and DAVID S. OWENS, JR.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. TAGGART, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATT v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv07689
Plaintiff:
TURRON L. PRATT
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DAVID S. OWENS, JR. and G.L. (Wip) WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2016cv07272
Plaintiff:
DARRIS T. COOK
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DAVID S. OWENS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICKLES v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv06915
Plaintiff:
ANDRE N. NICKLES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DAVID S. OWENS, JR. and G.L. WISLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARISTEO v. RAINES et al
as 1:2015cv04115
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ARISTEO
Defendant:
JODY RAINES, WEBMARCOM LLC, MICHELE MOKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KERN v. OWENS
as 1:2015cv01099
Petitioner:
BRUCE KERN
Respondent:
DAVID S. OWENS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ARISTEO v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2015cv00769
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ARISTEO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, JODY RAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
