Cases 1 - 10 of 19
David Hernandez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2824
Petitioner:
David Torres Hernandez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
USA v. David Torres
as 22-2108
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID TORRES
Garza v. Molina
as 21-40805
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Irma Garza
Defendant / Appellant:
Mayor Richard Molina, Council Member David Torres, Council Member Jorge Salinas and others
Altisource S. r.l. et al v. Chinapen et al
as 1:2021cv00984
Defendant:
912 East Group Corp, Tung Nguyen, 3722 63rd LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Altisource Online Auction, Inc., 2068 Arthur Group Corp, Altisource S. r.l. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Donald J. Trump for President, et al v. Secretary Commonwealth of PA, et al
as 20-3384
Intervenor Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA VOTERS ALLIANCE, DAVID TORRES, SEAN PARNELL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAWRENCE ROBERTS, DAVID JOHN HENRY and DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT INC
USA v. David Torres
as 20-17259
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID TORRES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. David Torres
as 20-10381
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID TORRES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. David Torres-Mendez
as 19-40577
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID TORRES-MENDEZ, also known as David Leonel Torres-Mendez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Juan Torres-Vasquez v. William Barr
as 19-71560
Petitioner:
JUAN DAVID TORRES-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
US v. Jose Saravia-Chavez
as 19-4256
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ORANGEL SARAVIA-CHAVEZ, a/k/a David Torres, a/k/a Jose Orangel Sarabia
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
