Cases 1 - 10 of 44
State of Tennessee, ex rel. et al v. Madison, Jr.
as 2:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, ex rel., Jonathan Skrmetti and David W Salyers
Defendant:
Minor David Madison, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Pedernera v. Cartwright et al
as 3:2019cv00777
Defendant:
Darrell S. Freeman, Sr., AAC Holdings, Inc., Lucius E. Burch III and others
Plaintiff:
Theresa Pedernera
Cooper v. Cartwright et al
as 3:2019cv00717
Defendant:
Darrell S. Freeman, AAC Holdings, Inc., Lucius E. Burch, III and others
Plaintiff:
Ben Cooper
Taylor v. USA
as 1:2019cv00208
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David W Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Patterson v. Purkey et al
as 3:2018cv00464
Plaintiff:
Thomas Patterson
Defendant:
Bradley County, Tennessee, John and Jane Does, Marshall Hicks and others
Intervenor:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lampkin v. Conscious Co-Parenting Institute et al
as 3:2018cv00827
Defendant:
High Road to Reunification, Melinda Lampkin, John and Jane Does 1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Lampkin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Henderson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (JRG1)
as 3:2017cv00428
Plaintiff:
David W Henderson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Robinson et al v. Purkey et al
as 3:2017cv01263
Plaintiff:
Fred Robinson , Ashley Sprague and Johnny Gibbs
Defendant:
David W. Purkey , Debby Moss , Melissa Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Leidos Innovations Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00360
Plaintiff:
David W Wallace
Defendant:
Leidos Innovations Corporation and Michele Mantello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roath v. Haslam et al
as 3:2017cv00995
Plaintiff:
Quinton Roath
Defendant:
William E. Haslam, Mark Gwyn, David W. Purkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
