Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Gee v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00159
Defendant: Davol, Inc., Ethicon, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Oliver Gee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sillah et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00399
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fatmata Sillah and Momodu Sillah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sebastian et al v. DAVOL, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00006
Plaintiff: Kay Sebastian and Michael Dobrzynski
Defendant: DAVOL, INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REED v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01194
Plaintiff: THERESA P. REED
Defendant: DAVOL, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Novak et al v. Bard, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00221
Plaintiff: Anthony Novak and Kathleen Smith Novak
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. DAVOL, INC., et al
as 1:2011cv00921
Plaintiff: ROBERT F. DAVIS
Defendant: DAVOL, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 7:2009cv00202
Plaintiff: James Clarence Jackson
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fiedler et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 7:2009cv00200
Plaintiff: William H. Fiedler and Christina Fiedler
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Scott et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00529
Plaintiff: Connie Scott and Rufus Scott
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Scott et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 7:2009cv00199
Plaintiff: Connie Scott and Rufus Scott
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?