Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Devin Wade v. Defense Contract Audit Agency DCCA
as 5:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Devin Wade
Defendant:
Defense Contract Audit Agency DCCA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard Hofelich, et al v. State of Hawaii, et al
as 22-16525
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD ROBERT HOFELICH
Intervenor Plaintiff:
SOUTH PACIFIC SCUBA TOURS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII, DCCA, DLNR, DENNIS KRUEGER, Esq. and others
Hofelich v. United States Coast Guard Vessel Documentation Center (USCGVDC)
as 1:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Howard Hofelich
Defendant:
United States Coast Guard Vessel Documentation Center (USCGVDC), State of Hawaii DCCA and DLNR, Dennis Krueger, Esq. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
South Pacific Scuba Tours, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.; et al. v. Fonoti; et al.
as 1:2018cv00118
Defendant:
Tala Raymond Fonoti , Willadean Lehuanani Grace , Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and others
Respondent:
David Keanu Sai , Rose Dradi and Dexter Kaiama
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
Petitioner:
State of Hawaii Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (DCCA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Livia Scotto v. The Corporation Trust, et al
as 10-15834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CORPORATION TRUST, THE HAWAI'I PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY, DCCA and others
Scotto v. Corporation Trust, The et al
as 1:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Defendant:
Corporation Trust, The, Hawai'i Public Housing Authority, The, DCCA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv01856
Plaintiff:
T. CARLTON RICHARDSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, D.C. COURT OF APPEALS, ERIC T. WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
