Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jerome Fox, Jr. v. Middle District of Georgia, Augusta Division, et al
as 22-11447
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JERMAINE FOX, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, AUGUSTA DIVISION and PATRIC CLAYTON, DEA Agent
Eric Watkins v. One Unknown U.S. Post Office, et al
as 17-14501
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ONE UNKNOWN U.S. POST OFFICE EMPLOYEE, TWO UNKNOWN DEA AGENTS and IVAN J. RAMIREZ, One United States Postal Inspector
WHITE v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 4:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G WHITE
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US ATTORNEY GENERAL, ERIC HOLDER, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv01020
Plaintiff:
Roberto Sandoval
Defendant:
State of Georgia, City of Atlanta, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyttenbach v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2015cv00318
Plaintiff:
William H. Wyttenbach
Defendant:
State of Florida, Florida Department of Health , State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Watkins v. One Unknown U.S. Post Office Employee et al
as 0:2013cv62448
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins
Defendant:
One Unknown U.S. Post Office Employee and Two Unknown DEA Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. Raines et al
as 9:2012cv80712
Plaintiff:
Gracia Jones and Marcia Jones
Defendant:
Troy Raines, Unnamed Palm Beach County Task Force Officers, Alan Oxley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elroy Phillips v. Brian Smith
as 10-13440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELROY A. PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN SMITH, DEA Agent, in his individual capacity
Baptiste v. Assistant United States Attorney et al
as 0:2008cv60514
Plaintiff:
Gary Jean Baptiste
Defendant:
Assistant United States Attorney, DEA Agents, DEA Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
