Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bert-Co Industries, Inc. et al v. Instant Web, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv01518
Plaintiff:
Bert-Co Industries, Inc. and Penn Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Instant Web Inc, Old Aultsville LLC and Dean Topolinski
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv08701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
BATOFF v. CHARBONNEAU et al
as 2:2014cv06879
Plaintiff:
JERALD S. BATOFF
Defendant:
JULIE CHARBONNEAU and DEAN TOPOLINSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bert-Co Industries, Inc. et al v. Instant Web, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02660
Plaintiff:
Bert-Co Industries, Inc. and Penn Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Instant Web, Inc. , Old Aultsville LLC and DEAN TOPOLINSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
Bert-Co Industries, Inc. et al v. Instant Web, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv00761
Plaintiff:
Bert-Co Industries, Inc. and Penn Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Instant Web, Inc. , Old Aultsville LLC and Dean Topolinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BATOFF v. TOPOLINSKI et al
as 2:2012cv06673
Plaintiff:
JERALD S. BATOFF
Defendant:
DEAN TOPOLINSKI and JULIE CHARBONNEAU
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BATOFF v. CHARBONNEAU et al
as 2:2012cv05397
Plaintiff:
JERALD S. BATOFF
Defendant:
JULIE CHARBONNEAU and DEAN TOPOLINSKI
Counter_claimant:
JULIE CHARBONNEAU and DEAN TOPOLINSKI
Counter_defendant:
JERALD S. BATOFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Direct Group LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00308
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Direct Group LLC, DGI Services, LLC, D.E. Shaw & Co., LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
RYAN v. DM ACQUISITION CORP. et al
as 1:2011cv00024
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RYAN
Defendant:
DM ACQUISITION CORP., DGI SERVICES LLC , BUDCO CONSUMER DIRECT INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
