Cases 1 - 10 of 205
Williams v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Debby Williams
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harpole v. Pike County, Missouri et al
as 2:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Shainey Harpole
Defendant:
Pike County, Missouri, Pike County Missouri Sheriff's Office, Stephen Korte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keskeaw v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv06106
Plaintiff:
Debbie Keskeaw
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cook v. City of Pike County et al
as 2:2023cv00033
Defendant:
Robert Embly, Jane Doe, City of Pike County and others
Plaintiff:
James Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Groves v. Bard Access Systems, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv06058
Plaintiff:
Debbie Groves
Defendant:
Bard Access Systems, Inc., Becton Dickinson & Company and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gromowsky et al v. Millsap et al
as 6:2023cv03124
Plaintiff:
Kelly Gromowsky, Zach Rogers, Chase Rogers and others
Defendant:
David Millsap, Debbie Neal, Joseph Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Penn v. Arthur
as 4:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Debbie R. Penn
Defendant:
Lt. Annabella Arthur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Laclede County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2022cv03175
Plaintiff:
Steven Glen Young
Defendant:
Laclede County Sheriff's Office, LaClede County, Missouri, David Millsap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Patrick v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Debbie Patrick
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
