Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1321
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1336
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
USA v. Damone Oakley
as 23-3101
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAMONE D. OAKLEY, a/k/a Alex Logan, a/k/a Officer Alex Logan, a/k/a Officer Victor Creed, a/k/a Officer Stan Valentine, a/k/a Dee Dimes
USA v. Dee Downs
as 21-1081
Defendant / Appellant:
DEE LAWRENCE DOWNS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Clarence Schreane v. Robert Marr, et al
as 17-1967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE D. SCHREANE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT MARR, Correction Counsel, individual capacity Defendant USP Lewisburg, B CHAMBERS, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, individual capacity Defendant USP Lewisburg, T LYNN, Education Dept., individual capacity Defendant USP Lewisburg and others
Joseph Brown v. Sarah Dee
as 17-1714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH A. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
SARAH DEES, Physician Assistant, USP
Darrell Parks v. S. Argueta, et al
as 15-4074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER S. ARGUETA, CORRECTION OFFICER T. CRAWFORD, J. OLDT and others
USA v. Joseph Dee
as 15-2527
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH DEES, a/k/a Joseph Lee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
