Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 158
Dee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv01601
Plaintiff: Kathryn Ann Dee
Defendant: Andrew M Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mullen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv08174
Plaintiff: Penelope Dee Mullen
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Patrick v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00637
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Amy Dee Patrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Moreno v. Brettkelly et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02082
Defendant: Anthony Brettkelly, Port of San Francisco, Mats Nalsen and others
Plaintiff: Jose Rigoberto Moreno
Chunn v. Saul
as 4:2019cv04866
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Dee Chunn
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dees v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv01903
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Plaintiff: Theresa Naomi Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gibson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019at00879
Plaintiff: Jay Dee Gibson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
(SS) Gibson v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01860
Plaintiff: Jay Dee Gibson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Saldana v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02127
Plaintiff: Saundra Dee Saldana
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
BOGARDE v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv03841
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff: BAMBI DEE BOGARDE
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?