Cases 1 - 10 of 10
NAJJAR v. SALAMEH et al
as 1:2024cv05043
Plaintiff:
KARIM P NAJJAR
Defendant:
RIAD SALAMEH, BANQUE DU LIBAN, BANK OF BEIRUT, S.A.L. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
FORD v. MERCER et al
as 2:2024cv04894
Defendant:
TINGO GROUP, INC., DARREN MERCER, HAO CHEN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
In Re: Letter of Request from SPS Corp I
as 1:2021mc00565
Petitioner:
SPS Corp I
Respondent:
General Motors Company, Deloitte & Touche LLP and Ernst & Young LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
LOMBARDOZZI v. DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP et al
as 2:2014cv08103
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LOMBARDOZZI
Defendant:
DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP , JOHN DOE INDIVIDUALS 1 TO 20 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1 TO 20
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Rigas et al v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP
as 4:2014mc00097
Plaintiff:
James Rigas , Zito I and Zito Media
Defendant:
Deloitte & Touche, LLP
Respondent:
Karen Chrosniak Larsen and James R. Brown
ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION et al v. DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP
as 2:2014mc00069
Plaintiff:
JAMES RIGAS, JOHN RIGAS, ZITO I, L.P. and others
Defendant:
DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP
Movant:
CARL E. ROTHENBERGER
BERNDT v. DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP et al
as 5:2012cv02157
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BERNDT
Defendant:
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP and DELOITTE LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Meer et al v. Deloitte & Touche LLP
as 1:2011cv00671
Plaintiff:
Jonah M. Meer , Actrade Liquidation Trust , Actrade International Corp. and others
Defendant:
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
